229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.43%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.28%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.28%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-11.04%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.38%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 574.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.68%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 168.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1884.87%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
588.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
358.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
529107.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 147.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1660.26%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 662.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1486.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 156.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
21902.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1295.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
820.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1833.66%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
672.77%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
302.46%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.28%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 38.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.84%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 3.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.10%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.51%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.95%
R&D growth of 10.95% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-10.21%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 7.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
