229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.62%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 15.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-19.23%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 49.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.77%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 201.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.77%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 201.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-22.73%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-42.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1765.09%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
499.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
300.86%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
21056.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
668.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
328.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
20884.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
898.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
585.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1991.43%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
671.56%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
311.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.73%
AR growth well above SONY's 4.42%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.81%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.67%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
R&D growth of 4.16% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
8.81%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 2.98%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
