229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.69%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-3.95%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.44%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.44%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6.81%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-8.82%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-6.06%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.19%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.12%
Diluted share change of 0.12% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.02%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 173.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1805.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
436.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
248.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.00%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
8417.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
399.95%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
181.14%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
14070.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
744.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
372.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2106.91%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
654.96%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
257.56%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.75%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-29.50%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 7.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.94%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.59%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
R&D growth of 3.42% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.24%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
