229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.01%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 5.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-22.37%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-27.03%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-27.03%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-27.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 77.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-28.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 77.73%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 77.73%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.08%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.12%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.16%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-46.62%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 393.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-51.34%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 100.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2168.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
443.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
211.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
9690.16%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
881.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 197.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
418.33%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
52224.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
755.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
199.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 84.62%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2411.76%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
602.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
232.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.92%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 4.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-14.43%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.69%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 0.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.31%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.79%
R&D growth of 10.79% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
