229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.99%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 21.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-26.73%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 71.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.73%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 71.88%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.73%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 249.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 249.36%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 249.36%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.24%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.30%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
15.43%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 11135.68%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-37.40%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 127.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.05%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 8544.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1695.90%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
355.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
123.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
76762.41%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
470.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
28426.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
519.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
110.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2208.15%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
504.78%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
184.13%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.77%
AR growth well above SONY's 16.17%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
36.31%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.63%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SONY's 4.58%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-6.87%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 6.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
R&D growth of 5.27% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-1.01%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 17.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
