229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.08%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.50%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.01%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.01%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.87%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 2565.57%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
11.11%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 2565.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 2565.81%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.57%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.64%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.08%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while SONY cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
26.57%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONY's 52.80%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
30.80%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 98.97%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1650.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
365.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
86.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.04%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10773.69%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
126.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
76.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
13577.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 179.06% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
548.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 439.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
76.38%
Below 50% of SONY's 325.81%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
2243.86%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
443.65%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
161.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.23%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.95%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.57%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 2.49%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.76%
Under 50% of SONY's 8.04%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.01%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.85%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 9.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.06%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 0.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
