229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
53.70%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
57.49%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 27.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
74.11%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SONY's 146.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
74.11%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 146.02%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
74.01%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
73.33%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
73.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.89%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.84%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 16.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.90%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 83814.45%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
128.81%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
171.32%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2222.64%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
462.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
120.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 2.36%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
8274.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
471.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
137.98%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
16685.59%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1550.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
708.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
123.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2322.89%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
461.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
143.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.38%
AR growth well above SONY's 14.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
20.29%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 18.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.78%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 3.66%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.91%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.01%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 19.46%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
13.87%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.22%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
