229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.53%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.65%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.59%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.59%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.28%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
12.50%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.37%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.31%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.32%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.02%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
29.21%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 60.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.12%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 92.76%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1522.02%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
352.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 18.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2606.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 49.04%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
351.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
39.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 89.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
7128.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
438.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 27.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
40.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of SONY's 68.55%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
1888.57%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
273.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
59.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.85%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
32.43%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.19%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-6.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.71%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SONY's 4.72%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.81%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 2.95%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
