229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
77.10%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
85.78%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
117.16%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SONY's 191.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
117.16%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 191.84%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
112.87%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SONY's 134.06%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
113.89%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SONY's 133.93%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
120.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SONY's 130.31%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-1.53%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.51%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.55%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 33360.53%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
154.51%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
224.08%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1920.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
414.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 8.78%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
4013.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 359.52%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
531.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
114.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 259.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
5675.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 342.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
477.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 296.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
53.89%
Below 50% of SONY's 1021.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1913.42%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
273.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.30%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
8.15%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 7.91%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.96%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.28%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.14%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.40%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.00%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
