229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.24%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 5.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.46%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 11.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.61%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-24.61%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.72%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.38%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.68%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.84%
Share reduction while SONY is at 4.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.24%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-43.42%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.48%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1646.60%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
371.20%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
66.98%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.78%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3375.96%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
797.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
53.98%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4468.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
384.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
31.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1872.51%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
259.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
41.97%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 11.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 19.54%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.27%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
5.49%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.51%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.21%
R&D growth of 1.21% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-3.89%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
