229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.49%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 34.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.80%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 28.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.95%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 317.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.95%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 317.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-21.31%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 174.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.34%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 171.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 170.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.10%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.06%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.54%
Dividend growth at 75-90% of SONY's 14.72%. Bill Ackman would press for a stronger return if the balance sheet allows.
-21.45%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 637.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.32%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 3644.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1303.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.23%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
252.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
62.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3061.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.84%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
247.90%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
68.31%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 89.81%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
3232.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
265.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
38.45%
Below 50% of SONY's 161.08%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1734.71%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
224.87%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
28.69%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.96%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 28.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-14.77%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.58%
Similar asset growth to SONY's 4.55%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-1.49%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
24.04%
Debt growth far above SONY's 5.62%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
6.05%
R&D growth of 6.05% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.01%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 12.90%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
