229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.82%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.41%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.83%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.83%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.19%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.26%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.52%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.45%
Share reduction while SONY is at 6.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.57%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 6.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.49%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-10.09%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 33.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.89%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 31.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1325.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
187.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
66.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1724.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
168.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
71.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 35.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2534.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
192.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
57.35%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of SONY's 70.42%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
1536.22%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
183.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.45%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.48%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
15.03%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.29%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.21%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.14%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SONY's 4.84%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.96%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 7.45%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
