229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-33.37%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-34.52%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 12.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-42.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-42.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-42.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-42.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-42.68%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.80%
Share reduction while SONY is at 7.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.95%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 9.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.47%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-57.76%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 216.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-61.62%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 141.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1138.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
140.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
38.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
10006.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 194.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
118.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
10.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 91.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2637.90%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 33.72% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
105.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
31.38%
Below 50% of SONY's 1733.02%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1503.98%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
148.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 12.35%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.96%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-5.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-6.94%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 21.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.09%
Asset growth at 75-90% of SONY's 4.60%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.03%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
26.86%
Debt growth far above SONY's 26.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.45%
R&D growth of 4.45% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-11.04%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
