229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.22%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 36.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-19.15%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 38.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-27.75%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 129.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-27.75%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 129.66%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.87%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 148.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 148.24%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 148.28%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.29%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.23%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
11.26%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 27386.66%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-8.34%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 64.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.14%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 114.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
961.28%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
76.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
41.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1056.23%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 41.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
14.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
60.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1708.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 32.15%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
33.48%
Below 50% of SONY's 2613.33%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1385.00%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
117.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 9.91%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.94%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-4.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 20.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-19.73%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 1.64%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.73%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
6.34%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.95%
R&D growth of 1.95% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.53%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 10.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
