229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.61%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.60%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
22.19%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.19%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.62%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.45%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.60%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
51.65%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 44.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
56.40%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 50.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
978.85%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
100.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
47.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1602.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
87.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 63.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
91.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 32.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1752.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 15.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
64.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 84.04%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
41.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1330.73%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
102.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.42%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.69%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
150.12%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.44%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.26%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.79%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2.47%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.39%
R&D growth of 0.39% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
1.19%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
