229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.49%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 4.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-31.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-39.65%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.65%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-38.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-36.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-38.10%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.38%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.24%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.69%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-53.84%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 303.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-59.88%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 62.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1061.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
68.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1879.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 109.37%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
12.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
8.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1555.78%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 172.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
18.67%
Below 50% of SONY's 174.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
26.41%
Below 50% of SONY's 344.02%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1164.16%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
63.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.73%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.28%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-26.33%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 8.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.30%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 20.12%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.02%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 2.58%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.69%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
12.53%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 33.51%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-3.31%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.78%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
