229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.16%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 41.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.07%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 48.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.61%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 101.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.61%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 101.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.96%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 71.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.75%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 71.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 71.99%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.59%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.54%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.68%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 27445.99%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-31.01%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 254.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-33.94%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 619.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
880.31%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
63.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
40.40%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
725.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
7.41%
Below 50% of SONY's 37.03%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-2.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1144.63%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
24.67%
Below 50% of SONY's 117.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1053.89%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
49.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
26.73%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.84%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
9.80%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 38.84%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
8.11%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.18%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SONY's 5.30%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-0.65%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 5.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.96%
Debt growth far above SONY's 16.10%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
5.80%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.75%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 21.67%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
