229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.79%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.97%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
21.84%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
21.84%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.91%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 52.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.81%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 52.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 52.77%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.88%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.95%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.96%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
80.54%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONY's 114.01%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
84.66%
FCF growth 50-75% of SONY's 139.48%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
901.22%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
86.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
992.83%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
118.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 67.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
36.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1303.07%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 143.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
66.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 114.76%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
45.81%
Below 50% of SONY's 129.64%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
992.02%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
44.65%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
38.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.20%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
57.62%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
54.32%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
8.73%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.12%
Similar to SONY's 1.93%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
6.78%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.04%
R&D growth of 2.04% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.82%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 1.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
