229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
67.92%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
70.15%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
100.26%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 301.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
100.26%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 301.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
87.28%
Net income growth comparable to SONY's 80.80%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
88.46%
EPS growth similar to SONY's 80.72%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
86.54%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SONY's 80.64%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.71%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.50%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.84%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 181083.59%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
80.72%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
118.63%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1001.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
108.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1117.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 143.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
55.25%
Below 50% of SONY's 258.89%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-4.12%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1421.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 45.19% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
97.22%
Below 50% of SONY's 706.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.22%
Below 50% of SONY's 57.88%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
900.46%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
41.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
29.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.17%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
36.23%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
42.68%
AR growth well above SONY's 7.64%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8.94%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 13.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.39%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.70%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 3.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
5.81%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 11.70%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
13.68%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
10.93%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
