229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.76%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 11.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-30.93%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 20.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-39.51%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 29.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-39.51%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 29.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.11%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 61.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-29.59%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 61.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-29.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 61.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.72%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.73%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.79%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-46.52%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 321.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-57.09%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 2649.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
897.19%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
83.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 2.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1453.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 577.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
58.39%
Below 50% of SONY's 127.92%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-8.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 392.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1520.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 96.24% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
89.51%
Below 50% of SONY's 4507.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
17.45%
Below 50% of SONY's 194.37%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
761.13%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 15.43%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
13.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.16%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.63%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
34.09%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-55.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 14.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
73.31%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 27.82%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-9.66%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.92%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.46%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.85%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.91%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 8.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
