229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.88%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 29.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-12.81%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 27.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-20.65%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 71.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-20.65%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 71.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 126.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-14.49%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 126.01%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 125.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.84%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.80%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
17.86%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 39619.64%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-4.24%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 83.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
2.62%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 136.22%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
804.23%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
98.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 8.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
26.02%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1289.68%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
143.77%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 83.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 22.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1261.54%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 56.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
119.88%
Below 50% of SONY's 6568.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
26.62%
Below 50% of SONY's 185.25%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
642.29%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 19.94%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
7.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 6.26%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.16%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
40.43%
Below 50% of SONY's 28373.32%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
17.67%
AR growth well above SONY's 25.53%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-22.53%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.98%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.75%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 9.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.94%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
9.56%
R&D growth of 9.56% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-1.01%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
