229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.09%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.94%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
27.80%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
27.80%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.62%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.42%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.65%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.60%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.75%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
34.75%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONY's 50.92%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
46.89%
FCF growth 75-90% of SONY's 55.89%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
930.36%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
121.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
487.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.84%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
159.73%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 80.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
70.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 47.88%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
1508.05%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
49.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of SONY's 94.63%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
521.47%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 7.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
5.58%
Below 50% of SONY's 18.38%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.04%
Below 50% of SONY's 3816.72%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
40.06%
Below 50% of SONY's 1166.77%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
85.82%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-33.36%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.73%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.22%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.32%
R&D growth of 1.32% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.63%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 2.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
