229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.04%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
33.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 12.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
44.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 779.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
44.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 779.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
41.35%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 4800.02%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
41.89%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 4789.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
43.84%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 4687.93%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.37%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.53%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.48%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 2462.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
36.71%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
41.58%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
989.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
93.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.43%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
790.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 135.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
55.93%
Below 50% of SONY's 158.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
14.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 157.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1534.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 411.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
102.29%
Below 50% of SONY's 825.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.63%
Below 50% of SONY's 153.33%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
576.32%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
20.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 13.96%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
7.89%
Below 50% of SONY's 24.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.67%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.60%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
41.06%
Below 50% of SONY's 29620.36%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-24.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
26.09%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.19%
Asset growth at 75-90% of SONY's 2.61%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
11.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 5.61%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.22%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.05%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.45%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
