229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-31.19%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-31.88%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 17.98%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-42.54%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 22.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.54%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 22.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-42.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-40.95%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-41.90%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.30%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.52%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.23%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-58.21%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 224.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.32%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 885.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
848.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
66.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.38%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1670.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 236.72%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
7.95%
Below 50% of SONY's 107.96%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 73.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1180.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 744.46% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
48.15%
Below 50% of SONY's 2568.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.70%
Below 50% of SONY's 255.59%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
481.16%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 19.61%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-4.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 26.41%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.50%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
39.97%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-28.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 15.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.09%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 17.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.49%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-9.02%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.83%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.18%
R&D growth of 1.18% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-6.79%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
