229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.25%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 10.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-11.53%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.53%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-13.12%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 147.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.29%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 147.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 147.90%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.21%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.11%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.79%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 90712.20%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
4.31%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 56.19%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.60%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 78.71%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
783.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
89.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
51.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
601.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 257.07%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
49.26%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 55.20%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
30.31%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 64.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1018.60%
Below 50% of SONY's 16395.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
70.53%
Below 50% of SONY's 702.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
53.43%
Below 50% of SONY's 254.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
409.98%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
4.92%
Below 50% of SONY's 27.46%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-9.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 35.17%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.90%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
35.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 49.82%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
0.75%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 7.91%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-31.31%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.78%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.82%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-3.74%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.83%
R&D growth of 7.83% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-0.72%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 8.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
