229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.01%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
20.20%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.66%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.66%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
36.26%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
38.18%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
38.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.75%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.76%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.43%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
71.11%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.80%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
808.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
63.35%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
796.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
98.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
47.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1050.61%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 142.52% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
113.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 158.29%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
81.45%
Below 50% of SONY's 214.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
300.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
7.19%
Below 50% of SONY's 36.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-15.68%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 49.29%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.49%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
34.47%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
73.02%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
22.38%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.05%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-4.52%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.45%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.43%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
