229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.38%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
44.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 13.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
63.64%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 286.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
63.64%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 286.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
62.47%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SONY's 73.14%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
65.79%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SONY's 74.77%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
64.47%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of SONY's 74.73%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-1.69%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.45%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.47%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 180416.79%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
53.27%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
65.81%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
738.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
62.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 20.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
656.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
19.76%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
34.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
842.99%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 688.79%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
63.27%
Below 50% of SONY's 200.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.16%
Below 50% of SONY's 320.43%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
258.58%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-3.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 42.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 61.31%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.21%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 59.67%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
35.70%
Below 50% of SONY's 99.41%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-12.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.22%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 6.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.62%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 2.98%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.64%
Under 50% of SONY's 3.41%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.23%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 30.44%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
8.30%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.52%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
