229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.49%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 10.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-36.48%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-49.73%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 20.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.73%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 20.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-49.41%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 23.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-49.21%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 24.72%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-48.80%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 24.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.24%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.43%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-56.38%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 50076.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-59.67%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 491.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
529.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
33.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
32.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 28.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
732.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 90.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-7.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 861.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
26.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 542.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
433.19%
Below 50% of SONY's 1094.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
10.16%
Below 50% of SONY's 238.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
22.25%
Below 50% of SONY's 1026.08%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
190.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 9.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-19.22%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 50.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.90%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 72.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.50%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
34.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-23.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-18.62%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 12.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.94%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-11.30%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.12%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.56%
R&D growth of 2.56% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-4.71%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
