229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.35%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 16.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.39%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 7.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.85%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 7.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.85%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 7.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.04%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 22.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.56%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 23.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 23.08%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.09%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.13%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
9.52%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 60438.41%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
22.24%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.98%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
28.35%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
462.88%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
59.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
58.34%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
401.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.76%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
44.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 35.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
126.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.95%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
412.19%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 137.06% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
40.03%
Below 50% of SONY's 127.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
55.51%
Below 50% of SONY's 706.46%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
148.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 15.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-23.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 52.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 77.41%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.11%
Below 50% of SONY's 47724.38%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
30.88%
Below 50% of SONY's 99.82%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
4.56%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 14.66%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
19.32%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.95%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.82%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 6.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.94%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 6.95%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
4.23%
R&D growth of 4.23% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-2.44%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 12.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
