229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.40%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.86%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.86%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.86%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.62%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.85%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.31%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.12%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.93%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.88%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
26.46%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 21.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
27.78%
FCF growth 75-90% of SONY's 35.40%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
377.45%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
66.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
48.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
443.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.08%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
102.20%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 32.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
58.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
341.63%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 124.93% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
50.86%
Below 50% of SONY's 114.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
42.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
105.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-27.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 69.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-41.14%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 70.38%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.86%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
29.65%
Below 50% of SONY's 592.49%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
16.74%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.09%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.06%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 1.77%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-8.58%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.62%
R&D growth of 4.62% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.17%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
