229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
72.24%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 12.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
79.55%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
126.96%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 330.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
126.96%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 330.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
126.90%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 1744.76%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
129.73%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 1435.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
130.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 1437.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.72%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.83%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.65%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 64112.18%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
88.39%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
87.65%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
533.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
92.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 9.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
502.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 1614.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
85.32%
Below 50% of SONY's 178.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
65.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 155.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
627.94%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 444.20%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
105.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 170.96%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
73.07%
Below 50% of SONY's 198.42%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
84.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-32.21%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 73.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-42.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 72.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.78%
Below 50% of SONY's 48748.05%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
30.67%
Below 50% of SONY's 145.42%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
56.55%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
22.46%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.31%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.09%
Under 50% of SONY's 4.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.35%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 9.59%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.72%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.08%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
