229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.61%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 7.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.10%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 23.24%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-17.98%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 39.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-17.98%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 39.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-17.82%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 97.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.06%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 135.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 136.41%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.07%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.08%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.56%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-38.13%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 302.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-38.43%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 5559.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
460.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
133.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
75.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.44%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
494.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 246.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
172.16%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to SONY's 189.38%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
90.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 142.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
508.98%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 795.25%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
195.85%
Below 50% of SONY's 875.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
105.10%
Below 50% of SONY's 261.45%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
73.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 42.70%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-30.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 95.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 89.95%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.39%
Below 50% of SONY's 689.45%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
29.64%
Below 50% of SONY's 858.59%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-43.64%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 15.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.77%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 5.61%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
5.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.98%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
8.57%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 24.33%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.92%
R&D growth of 1.92% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.63%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 9.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
