229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.10%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 27.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.42%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 19.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-12.28%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 13.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.28%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 13.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.98%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-7.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-7.14%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.74%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.87%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
10.10%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 8522.35%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-12.04%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-12.49%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
344.45%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
151.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
196.12%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 26.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
159.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 56.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
70.98%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
363.96%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 317.73%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
265.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 216.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
121.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.63%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
44.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 49.97%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
-33.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 98.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 81.48%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.75%
Below 50% of SONY's 147.64%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
21.10%
Below 50% of SONY's 108.09%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
2.64%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 25.75%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-0.79%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.17%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.39%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 6.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.12%
Debt growth far above SONY's 0.15%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
8.65%
R&D growth of 8.65% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
1.84%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 24.45%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
