229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.41%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.58%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.86%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.87%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.54%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-4.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-10.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
364.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
131.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
54.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.47%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
205.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.50%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
63.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
20.53%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
389.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 122.79% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
196.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 242.75%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
69.49%
Below 50% of SONY's 2372.84%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
29.82%
Below 50% of SONY's 77.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-35.95%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 126.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 92.31%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.29%
Below 50% of SONY's 801.92%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
20.12%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SONY cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
51.90%
AR growth well above SONY's 6.26%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
27.08%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 5.28%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.42%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.00%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 3.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.40%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.96%
R&D growth of 0.96% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.77%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 4.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
