229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.69%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
54.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 20.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
74.42%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 321.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
74.42%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 321.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
68.51%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 97.97%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
68.80%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONY's 97.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
69.35%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONY's 95.34%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.58%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.70%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.12%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 27107.45%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
132.50%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
160.13%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
325.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 22.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
104.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 42.42%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 18.16%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
325.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 503.46%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
122.98%
Below 50% of SONY's 1149.97%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
103.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to SONY's 110.06%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
321.58%
Below 50% of SONY's 3985.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
150.28%
Below 50% of SONY's 490.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
100.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
27.03%
Below 50% of SONY's 122.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-29.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 191.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 119.02%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.17%
Below 50% of SONY's 195.87%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
20.88%
Below 50% of SONY's 98.24%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
26.69%
AR growth well above SONY's 5.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-10.70%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 18.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.60%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 7.27%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
14.68%
50-75% of SONY's 23.22%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.54%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
9.25%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.83%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
