229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.52%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 4.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-21.54%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 9.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-27.74%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-27.74%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.78%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-27.01%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-27.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.69%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.70%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-40.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.92%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
298.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
136.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 42.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
92.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.00%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
223.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
187.73%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 84.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
189.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
245.56%
Below 50% of SONY's 1044.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
191.18%
Below 50% of SONY's 1174.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
148.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.96%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
5.59%
Below 50% of SONY's 141.68%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-35.45%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 211.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.88%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 114.96%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.67%
Below 50% of SONY's 561.42%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
19.92%
Below 50% of SONY's 1355.92%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-30.42%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-7.08%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 11.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.01%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.65%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-2.29%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.28%
R&D dropping or stable vs. SONY's 2.92%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-3.97%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 7.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
