229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.72%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 27.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.68%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 18.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.03%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 46.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.03%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 46.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.26%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 62.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.08%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 63.31%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 63.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.71%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.86%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
6.77%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 12298.06%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-18.72%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 315.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.95%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 2164.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
284.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 34.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
134.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
74.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 29.22%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
264.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 195.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
239.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 115.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
122.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 2.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
257.49%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 307.84%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
186.75%
Below 50% of SONY's 1104.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
118.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-15.63%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 168.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-43.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 206.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.86%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 100.01%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.61%
Below 50% of SONY's 197.70%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.79%
Below 50% of SONY's 98.77%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-6.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 21.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.49%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.09%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 4.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.17%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.24%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 11.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
6.42%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SONY's 12.72%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.92%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 14.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
