229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.66%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.16%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.88%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.88%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
6.58%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.50%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.88%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.03%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
5.39%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
310.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
120.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.26%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 8.37%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
332.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 46.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
98.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
35.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
313.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 137.37% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
148.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to SONY's 153.20%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
69.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 185.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 191.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-37.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 94.20%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.51%
Below 50% of SONY's 1851.75%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
19.27%
Below 50% of SONY's 874.71%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
44.25%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8.96%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 10.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.89%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.32%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 8.70%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-0.53%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 23.77%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.12%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 6.20%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
