229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.96%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.12%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 19.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
44.68%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 541.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
44.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 541.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
44.77%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 96.43%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
46.51%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 96.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
45.74%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 96.95%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.86%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
2.64%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 31985.11%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
40.94%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45.01%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
255.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.82%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
70.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 27.06%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.26%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
140.12%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
54.66%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
23.83%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
279.44%
Below 50% of SONY's 1772.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
92.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 175.57%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
49.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 44.90%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
-26.31%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 191.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-47.93%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 172.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 81.69%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
150.02%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 176.55%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.
45.22%
Below 50% of SONY's 245.63%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.31%
Below 50% of SONY's 73.25%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-11.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 9.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
37.89%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 25.13%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.70%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
12.92%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.46%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
14.02%
We increase R&D while SONY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.59%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
