229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.05%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 19.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.60%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 15.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-21.37%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.37%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-19.46%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.05%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 20.95%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 21.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.66%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.68%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.48%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-16.01%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 110.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.14%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 85.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
262.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
97.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 36.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.66%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 29.69%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
280.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
140.33%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
137.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
321.74%
Below 50% of SONY's 9183.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
122.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 106.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
137.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 40.52%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-23.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 198.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-37.63%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 158.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-12.44%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 76.55%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
144.19%
10Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 120.26%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if a higher payout growth rate remains sustainable long term.
45.67%
Below 50% of SONY's 717.27%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
19.47%
Below 50% of SONY's 641.62%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-33.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 9.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.71%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 29.51%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.21%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
10.31%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.35%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 8.58%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.27%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 15.47%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.14%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 18.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
