229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.75%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 24.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.25%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 16.81%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.79%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 24.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.79%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 24.62%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-17.71%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 21.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-16.99%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 23.96%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 24.32%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.57%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.45%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
6.05%
Dividend growth under 50% of SONY's 14109.98%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-7.63%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 545.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-5.29%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 227.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
279.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 42.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
91.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 30.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
50.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 37.67%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
452.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 43.38%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
126.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
78.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
372.12%
Below 50% of SONY's 7314.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
114.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
94.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.17%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-19.94%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 167.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-34.77%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 122.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 55.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
124.36%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 178.56%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
31.08%
Below 50% of SONY's 192.38%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
15.69%
Below 50% of SONY's 74.08%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
9.16%
AR growth well above SONY's 1.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.75%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.87%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.31%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 3.23%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.20%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 5.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.68%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 9.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
