229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.41%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.02%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.27%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.27%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.47%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.75%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.87%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.65%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.75%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 31.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.98%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 126.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
287.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 43.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
75.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 60.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
51.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 73.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
253.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.39%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
36.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14.78%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
395.95%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.10%
Below 50% of SONY's 2824.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
98.07%
Below 50% of SONY's 905.24%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-18.37%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 167.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-28.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 149.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
4.00%
Below 50% of SONY's 73.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
120.26%
Below 50% of SONY's 902.83%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
31.07%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SONY is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
17.04%
Below 50% of SONY's 290.37%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
55.63%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-13.88%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.24%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 3.79%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.75%
Under 50% of SONY's 9.30%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
13.41%
Debt growth far above SONY's 1.44%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-1.81%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.98%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 4.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
