229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-22.94%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-30.89%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-30.89%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-30.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-30.14%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-29.82%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.67%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.35%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-43.13%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 1107.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-44.82%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 66.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
216.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
89.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 33.21%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
10.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 33.21%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
166.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
146.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
267.58%
Below 50% of SONY's 3034.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
148.11%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 18.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
8.78%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-1.85%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 160.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-14.94%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 117.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
16.63%
Below 50% of SONY's 40.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
121.66%
Below 50% of SONY's 243.39%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
30.77%
Below 50% of SONY's 1750.24%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
17.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.28%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-17.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.29%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 13.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.56%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.80%
Under 50% of SONY's 1.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.19%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
2.69%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SONY's 1.52%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.69%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
