229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.67%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.59%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.72%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.72%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-31.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-30.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-30.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.97%
Share reduction while SONY is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.69%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.38%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-7.09%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-10.50%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
252.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.40%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
75.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 52.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
23.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 19.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
216.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 81.70%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
59.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
44.23%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 68.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
172.27%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 279.24%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
27.48%
Below 50% of SONY's 1485.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-22.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 82.60%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-20.13%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 241.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-25.48%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 70.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-1.91%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 48.42%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
110.36%
Below 50% of SONY's 305.15%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
29.46%
Below 50% of SONY's 387.63%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
13.56%
Below 50% of SONY's 73.02%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
53.44%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
18.18%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.06%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-13.80%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.26%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.01%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.21%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 3.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
