229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.28%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.01%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 22.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-30.92%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 63.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-30.92%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 63.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 46.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-31.54%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 47.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-31.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 47.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.58%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.97%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-19.99%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.65%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 262.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
154.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
90.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.43%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
6.43%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 25.20%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
94.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 1667.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
109.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 83.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-7.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 541.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
182.26%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 353.93%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
156.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 83.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.57%
Below 50% of SONY's 62.16%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-19.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 203.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-0.93%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 101.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 11.26%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
111.76%
Below 50% of SONY's 980.52%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
29.51%
Below 50% of SONY's 1092.30%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
13.49%
Below 50% of SONY's 63.89%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-16.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-9.29%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.74%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.64%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.43%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.41%
R&D growth of 3.41% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-6.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
