229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.39%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-4.69%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.69%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.43%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.85%
Negative EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.85%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.61%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.72%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5.62%
Dividend growth of 5.62% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
16.35%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.88%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
191.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
82.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
185.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 60.75%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
98.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 51.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
32.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
237.55%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 33.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
141.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
30.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of VUZI's 36.24%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
-19.44%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
5.42%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
98.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 98.73% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
24.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.90% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
12.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.27% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.95%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.49%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.08%
Asset growth well under 50% of VUZI's 3.19%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.84%
We have a declining book value while VUZI shows 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
3.58%
We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.70%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-1.16%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
