229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.16%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.33%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
82.98%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
82.98%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
65.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
65.28%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
65.28%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VUZI's 0.33%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.27%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.27%
Dividend growth of 0.27% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
273.49%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.35%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
282.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
98.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.72%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 12.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to VUZI's 36.24%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.19% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.26%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.84%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.31%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
3.31%
We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
