229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.67%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-19.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-281.37%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-281.37%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-269.79%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-276.83%
Negative EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-270.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.04%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.08%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.10%
Dividend growth of 8.10% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-425.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-245.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
357.19%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
111.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
47.19%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-199.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 12.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VUZI is 36.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.36% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.58%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
41.28%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-7.90%
We have a declining book value while VUZI shows 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
414.52%
We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.25%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
