229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.37%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
58.07%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
113.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
113.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
64.86%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
60.32%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.63%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.99%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
65.84%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
26.65%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-37.53%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-14.90%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
15.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VUZI's 60.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-37.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is at 51.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
213.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
18.37%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of VUZI's 33.50%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
222.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 36.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
133.84%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
30.09%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
75.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.98%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-25.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
46.99%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.76%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
35.74%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
