229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.07%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.73%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
715.38%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
715.38%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
41.86%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
40.91%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.78%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.00%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-3.28%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-33.22%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-51.97%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-19.72%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
83.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 60.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-108.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is at 51.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-112.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 12.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
179.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 33.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
235.26%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-53.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VUZI is 36.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
60.23%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
35.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
98.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.12%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
90.00%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.96%
Negative asset growth while VUZI invests at 3.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.42%
75-90% of VUZI's 2.76%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.79%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.77%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
